When undergoing breast reconstruction, women have two basic options. One involves the use of breast implants and the other, called autologous tissue reconstruction, restores the breast using tissue from the patient’s own body. As with any surgical procedure, each has it’s own set of advantages and disadvantages to consider.
Implant Breast Reconstruction
Implant breast reconstruction is the method which has been around the longest. It is the less complex of the two options and can be performed by more plastic and reconstructive surgeons than the autologous options. The reconstruction can be performed using either saline or silicone implants, though silicone tends to offer a more natural look and feel and will match the natural breast better in women who are having only one breast restored.
When compared with autologous tissue breast restoration, implant restoration offers the advantage of a shorter hospital stay and a shorter, easier recovery. On the other hand, unlike techniques using the patient’s own tissue, breast implants are not natural to the human body, an issue many women aren’t comfortable with. Breast implants also require maintainence. Though many believe breast implants are permanent, they tend to need replaced every 10 years or so. And though silicone breast implants look and feel more natural than saline, they can’t compare with the natural look and feel of a woman’s own body tissue.
Autologous Tissue Reconstruction
Autologous tissue breast restoration offers several advantages women like. For instance, rather than using an implant, it uses tissue from the woman’s own body to create a breast that looks, feels and moves like a natural breast. And many women like the idea of using tissue from their own bodies rather than implants which are alien to the body. Autologous tissue breast reconstruction also offers the advantage of permanence. Breast implants, though long lasting, do tend to need replacement every ten years or so.
On the other hand, autologous tissue reconstruction is much more complex than procedures using breast implants. Much fewer surgeons are trained to perform them well. And autologous tissue procedures do require longer hospital stays and a more difficult recovery than implant reconstruction. In some instances, weakness in the donor site, such as the abdomen, is experienced– a trade-off which needs to be thoroughly explored and considered before undergoing the procedure. Scarring in the donor site is also an issue to consider with autologous procedures.
There are numerous autologous tissue breast reconstruction techniques currently being used by skilled breast reconstructive surgeons. They include the DIEP flap, SIEA flap, TRAM flap and other procedures. Your breast reconstructive surgeon can discuss these options in detail with you.
With both implant and autologous tissue reconstruction, nipple reconstruction is the final step, allowing the breast to look and feel more complete.
According to Houston plastic surgeon Dr. Bob Basu, breast reconstruction using either an implant or autologous tissue, is not only a chance to restore the breast after mastectomy, but a chance for enhancement as well. He encourages patients to take this opportunity to create a look they’ll love in both breasts, possibly incorporating elements of a breast lift or breast augmentation. Houston patients seek Dr. Basu’s help for immediate reconstruction during the mastectomy process, or later, after a period of healing. For more information about breast reconstruction, using your bodies own tissue or breast implants, Houston reconstructive surgeon Dr. Basu offers great information on his website. Or, consult plasticsurgery.org to schedule a personal consultation with a board certified plastic surgeon in your area.